In article >,
Brigitta Bali > wrote:
>Mr Bland Gland wrote:

Message-ID: >
 wrote:
|Listen Honey-Bunny, do you even know what those words mean? For weeks I've
|been trying to figure out why you use a compliment when you seem to be
|trying to insult me. Heck, I almost did what I never do: go to the library
|and look it up in a dictionary. But then, why? I'm never wrong, and
|certainly not in this case. AFAIK, bland is "easygoing, friendly". To look
|up the correct Hungarian word for it, I checked in the Orszagh
|Angol-Magyar Szotar, and, of course I found out it meant "ja'mbor,
|nya'jas". 

Check the Oxford. Of food: not stimulating. You aren't. You weren't. You're
incapable.

|Although I'm not a doctor, as you're not a poet, 

Oh but I am.

|I'm sure that a gland is a vital organ. So you're saying I'm Mr. Friendly
|Vital Organ? Mmmmmm...I like that. Maybe you and your Stale Male husband
|should first learn a language to be effective in communication.
|Your Friendly Vital Organ. I do, I like it!

Unless, of course, the organ is a tumorous prostrate, which may explain the
lack of fertile zingers in your come-backs.

In article >,
Brigitta Bali > wrote:
>|Although I'm not a doctor, as you're not a poet,
>
>Oh but I am.

Sugar tush, the only thing that comes to my mind reading your pseudo poetry in
your silly English is what the immortal Monty Python said:

"It was clear the joke was lethal.. no-one could read it and live"

To make it clear:
Lamborghini=true poetry=high appeal
Brigi&Wally=pseudo poetry=low appeal

You're cute, though. I enjoy reading your articles, your lack of common sense
is amusing. If you wanna see real creativity, check moi out at:

http://helmert.mps.ohio-state.edu/students/gbarsai.html

BTW, did you know that on this day:

1405 Years Ago, in 591:
    [9.7.17.12.14] Dating of the Chinkultik disc, a ballgame marker
    from Chiapas.

5 Years Ago, in 1991:
    Mexicali native Guadalupe Jones, 23, obtains the Miss Universe title,
    in Las Vegas, the first time for a Mexican contestant.

The Friendly Vital Organ

In article 
.de>, "L.Gordeev" > writes:
>
>On Wed, 15 May 1996, Funkdafied forgot to take his medicine on time and 
blathered::
>
>> WHY THE FUCK IS THIS HERE?? YOU FUCKING FAGGOT, IF YOU WANT TO DISCUSS 
>> THE SOVIET UNION DO IT SOME WHERE ELSE, I DIDNT COME INTO THIS NEWS GROUP 
>> TO SEE THIS SHIT YOU FUCKING FAGGOT!
>> 
>> I don't understand why this is all over this fucking news group. 
>
>It's easy: This is because such f*** faggots keep responding to this f*** 
>shit from all over their f*** groups you f*** faggot!
>


hrm.  i think he doth protest too much.  anyone who uses "faggot" more than 
once or twice in a post is obviously closeting something, ne?

and why all this vituperation towards blocks of wood?


This Papal Bull brought to you by Rite Rev Dr Dr Mr MD Laughing Coyote ELF 
KSC DDS SSD FLF EEEK, Discordian episkopos and duly appointed Pope Lascivious 
III of the Paratheo-anametamystikhood of Eris Esoteric. Chaosofer, zenarchist.
"Experience should teach us to be most on our guard to protect liberty when the
 
Government's purposes are beneficent. Men born to freedom are naturally alert 
to repel invasion of their liberty by evil-minded rulers. The greatest dangers
to liberty lurk in insidious encroachment by men of zeal, well-meaning but 
without understanding."- Justice Louis D. Brandeis, dissenting, Olmstead v. US,

Bast wrote:
> 
> Ok, ok, we get the picture...you don't have to repeat it continuously!
> Jeez, some of us don't even want the nude pictures!
> 
> --Tina


This guy is AWFULLY protective of his sister...

Igor GAZDIK > wrote:
>
>	so far it has not had that effect.   but it has speeded up 
>	the traffic on the danube (thus reducing pollution), as well
>	as improved irrigation on both banks.

Huh, that's a good one!  Ignor Gazdik just forgot to mention that both
banks are now well in Slovakia in the questionable section of the river.

Joe

In article >, (Al
exander N. Bossy') says:

>The big difference between the Soviet Union and Romania is that the Soviet
>Union was the last surviving colonial empire.  It's collapse in the face of
>nationalism was just as certain as the collapse of the British and French
>colonial empires, which were as certain as the collapse of the Ottoman and
>Hapsburg colonial empires.  Romania, on the other hand, is a nation state. 
>Transylvania became part of Romania because a majority of its population
>was ethnic Romanian, and wanted to become part of Romania. 

You really believe that any part of any country/nation-state that was 
annexed after WW1 had anything to do with what the inhabitants wanted?
You only express yourself in terms of Romanian nationalistic interests
and propaganda.

[snip]..
>In each case, it involved a world war.  Do you see one happening soon?  
>I don't.  Hungary and Romania both want to join the west, and neither is
>going to be accepted if they don't settle the Transylvanian issue, which,
>from the western point of view, means that Hungary renounces any claims 
>to Transylvania, and that Romania guarantees minority rights. 

There isn't any *official* Hungarian claim to Transylvania. A few loud 
irredentists, a lot of sympathy for Hungarian speakers and culture in 
Transylvania, but not an official agenda. Do you know about some secret 
Hungarian government policy to take back Transylvania?? You really are 
paranoid about Transylvania going back to the Hungarians, aren't you? 
BTW both Hungary and Romania are going to be nothing more pawns, buffer 
states, cannon fodder, for the main players in the big game

>> Who is to say that the various developments in former  
>>Yugoslavia will not happen in other nearby territories? 
> 
>Given the mess throughout the Yugoslav shards, the vast majority of the
>populations of neighboring countries have realized that their are limits to
>how far they are willing to go in their own eth ic anymosities.  For
>example, the whole situation in the Trans-Dneister, bad as it remains,
>calmed down noticably as a result of the Bosnian civil war. 

Golly, you really do need to convince yourself, don't you? I recall in
Britain just before the Yugoslav crisis really took off how everyone was
just saying *aahhh, it'll all blow over in a few weeks...just a bunch of
hotheads; they'll be sorted out soon*.... and what happened? What about all
the Allies at the beginning of WWII that were caught napping, smug in their
coviction that either war wouldn't happen or their extant defences would
suffice anyway? Hahahahahaha...

>>It only needed a slimeball like Milosevic to make it all possible (all 
>>the other cronies and thugs everywhere are just waiting in the wings for 
>>their own Milosevices to appear....) 
> 
>No.  

Milosevic, along with his nationalist/mafia cronies, etc, engineered the 
whole split. It was Milosevic who created the riot in Belgrade to effect 
a state of emergency and mobilise the federal army..etc etc... do some 
homework, but don't report back to me.

It also requires as Tudjman and an Izebegovich.  Those three men feed
>off of each other, and it is precisely the West's labeling of one a
>monster, while overlooking the atrocities committed by the other 
[snip]..

Yaawwn...I've been over this ground so often during the last few years
that it has become boring to listen to parrots dutifully reciting typical 
propaganda. You obviously know nothing about the Yugoslav crisis or simply
choose to follow propaganda that fits your nationalist agenda. A complete
Waste of time. 

>Each one of these regimes has dehumanized non-coreligionists, and each one
>was responsible for countless rapes, murders and ethnic cleansings.  They
>all should be haulled up infront of the War Crimes Tribunal, along with
>Clinton for his welcoming of the single largest occurence of ethnic
>cleansing in the war, rather than putting an immediate stop to it, as he
>could have. 

Yes, atrocities were committed on all sides, but it was Milosevic who 
personally ordered the first massacres on the initial attack on eastern 
Slavonia. Mladic personally ordered the shelling of civilians in Sarajevo 
and supervised the Srjebenica massacre (among everything else,) Karadzic 
(just a peacetime mafia crook anyway) personally took part in the Sarajevo 
shellings...etc, this gave the lead to all the thugs on ALL sides as to 
how the war was to be conducted (nothing new to the Balkans, of course.) 
At the beginning several foreign journalists were so appalled at the 
disgusting way the Serb forces were conducting themselves that they took 
up arms against them. You seem like an apologist for the Serbs. Fits your
nationalistic interests, does it?

[snip]..
>>the only *permanent* thing is *change*! 
> 
>Change doesn't mean that the past will repeat itself.  The restabishment 
>of the Kingdom of St. Stephen is about as likely to happen as the
>reestablishment of the Kingdom of Jersualem. 

Hahahaha...this is the bottom line for you, isn't it? I post something 
about the possibilities of border changes in general and in reply you 
repeat your nationalistic slogans. My sympathies...

Regards,

#In article >,  
#says...
#>
#>Igor GAZDIK > wrote:
#>>
#>>       so far it has not had that effect.   but it has speeded up 
#>>       the traffic on the danube (thus reducing pollution), as well
#>>       as improved irrigation on both banks.
#>
#>Huh, that's a good one!  Ignor Gazdik just forgot to mention that both
#>banks are now well in Slovakia in the questionable section of the 
#river.
#>
#>Joe

	sometimes (= mostly) it is really boring to read your lines.
	the reason is one and only: lack of decency and reasoning
	ability.   the danube has not moved one millimeter from the
	original bed.   and in the middle of the riverbed runs the
	border.   i think it is hard to expelin this to you, as your
	great hobby is badmouthing others, using no matter what kind
	of demagoguery.   by both banks i mean the slovak side, and the
	maly zitny ostrov side (in hu).   had the hungarian part not 
	pulled down the circular dam, hungarians would now be lining up
	on the slovak border to go and kiss the hands of the slovaks
	who have built a marvelous works like this for the benefit of
	hungary.   instead, you send lamebrains to slovakia, to take
	advantage of a much more liberal system and demonstrate there.

I have a suggestion: get yourselves a bunch of dictionaries and spend a 
few hours looking all this up. If you have to post each other, leave 
SCM out of it. WE ARE NOT INTERESTED. I repeat, WE ARE NOT INTERESTED. 
Your cooperation would be greatly appreciated.
On 17 May 1996, Normand Martel 
wrote:

> PiotrChruszczewski > wrote:
> >
> > 
> > 
> > On Sun, 5 May 1996, Christopher. Armstrong wrote:
> > 
> > >=20
> > >=20
> > > On 2 May 1996, Fabio Bizzetti wrote:
> > >=20
> > > >=20
> > > > 3 words? not always so (i.e. in Italian you dont need to use the subjec
=
> > t, it's
> > > > already in the tense).
> > > >=20
> > > > >"Jeg elsker dig."
> > > > this was Danish I guess. (I love Denmark btw)
> > > >=20
> > > > I=20
> > add:
> > > >=20
> > > > "Jag =C4lskar Dig" - Swedish (I love Sweden btw :))
> > > > "Ti Amo" - Italian (I am Italian, btw)
> > > > "Je T'Aime" - French
> 
> Please add "Mwen rinmin' Ou" in Haitian Creole...
> 
> Normand Martel
> 
> > > > "S'Agapo" - Greek
> > > > "Te Amo" - Spanish (not sure)
> > > > "Ich Liebe Dich" - German
> > > >=20
> > > > hmm.. no need to impress a girl this way 8-)
> > > > Just watch her in the eyes and kiss her... 9-)
> > 
> > olala, questi ITALIANI, ma mi piaccono ITALIANE, e questo e' verisssimo!
> > 
> > ciao,
> > PIETRO
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > > >=20
> > > > It always worked for me :)
> > > >=20
> > > >=20
> > >      Oh what a MAN you are!!! What amazing, perfect, specimens of manhood
=
> > =20
> > > ALL of you Italians are!!! Do you know, the rest of the world just lives=
> > =20
> > > in a constant state of profound jealousy, considering JUST how wonderful=
> > =20
> > > you and your friends must be!
> > >    OR,,,  Fotiti, cazzo! - as I believe you dashing Romeos say. Whichever
=
> > =20
> > > you prefer.
> > >    Ciao.
> > > >      Chris xxx
> > >=20
> > >=20
> > > >   /--------------------------------------------------------------------
=
> > ---\
> > > >   |  Fabio "Maverick" Bizzetti -  - Maverick* at IR
=
> > C  |
> > > >   |            The maker of "CyberMan" and "Virtual Karting"           
=
> >    |
> > > >   |              working on "VirtualRally" & "StarFighter"             
=
> >    |
> > > >   \--------------------------------------------------------------------
=
> > ---/
> > > >=20
> > > >=20
> > > >=20
> > > >=20
> > >=20
> > >=20
> 
> 
>

In article >, 
(Edward Antoniu) wrote:

> Hungarian Lobby > writes:
> 
> >From: 
> >Date: Mon, 13 May 1996 08:59:32 -0400
> >Subject: HL: Contact with Pro-TV of Romania
> 
> >MESSAGE TO OUR ROMANIAN FRIENDS:
> 
> >Romanians and Hungarians must work together for a better future. The
> >Hungarian Lobby, which includes members of the 1.5 million community of
> >Hungarian-Americans is in favor of Hungarian-Romanian reconciliation and
> >friendship, based on mutual respect and equality. 

No problems here. In fact, if there is anything that I could do to further
such a mutually beneficial friendship, please outline it.

> >I for one, am also in favor
> >of the formation of a Danubian Confederation in which our two nations would
> >be founding members.
> 
>         Bela, if you are sincere, then what you say is desired by many people
> indeed. I'm afraid that the last suggestion, although maybe goodwilled, might
 
> need some time to be embraced by both sides. Help removing the scars on both 
> sides first, and then maybe boundaries will remove themselves if this is good
 
> for both sides.

Also, considering the populations involved in our two countries, are 
Hungarians really ready to be a large minority ruled a majority of the time 
by Romanians?

> >We want to help the Romanian people. But we do not want to help in the
> >reelection of the former Communists by revarding the Iliescu government with
> >permanent MFN status now. We hope that the next government of Romania will
> >make the press truly free, will return all the Church properties, will
> >guarantee the cultural autonomy of the national community of Hungarians and
> >similarly to Slovakia, will include Recommendation 1201 of the European
> >Community in the Basic Agreement between our nations. When that happens, we
> >will not only support permanent MFN for Romania, but will do all that good
> >neighbors should do in helping each other.

There is a great deal of difference between helping to get MFN status 
permanent, not hindering it, and opposing it. As I understand your post, 
you are opposing it. This is not the same as a refusal to reward. The 
continuance of the Jackson-Vanik arrangements with respect to Romania is
a tempting one from your perspective I can see. But what will happen 
if, like in Hungary, an anti-communist government is followed by a 
communist one based on backlash? Having, in the meantime, supported 
permanent MFN would you then lobby to reinstate annual reviews? I think
that MFN is a weak reed to base positive American influence on Romanian
policy to respect the rights of all Romanians. 

I share your hopes that the next government of Romania will be a better
one. I do think that you should reconsider advocating group rights for
Romania (recommendation 1201). I do not think that you wish to put your 
fellow hungarians in Romania on the same socio-legal footing as blacks 
"enjoy" in America. This would, long-term, lead to increased tensions 
between our communities in Transylvania, not increased harmony, something 
that I hope we both agree would be a disaster for all concerned.

DB

-- 
Now available on the Romanian Political Pages
The only net copy of the Romanian constitution in Romanian
(I wonder why the government never put it on their sites?)
http://haven.ios.com/~dbrutus